No products in the cart.

Both Zowie (by BenQ) and Logitech are well-respected brands in the gaming/peripheral world. Whether one is โbetterโ depends heavily on what you value mostโsimplicity, raw performance, customization, or software support. Zowie tends to prioritize minimalism and performance, while Logitech offers broader feature sets and more customization. Below, youโll see how they stack up in different areas.
| Feature | Zowie | Logitech |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Performance | Zowie uses reliable sensors like the PMW3360 / PAW series. In many comparisons vs Logitech models, the sensor consistency (tracking accuracy, lift-off distance) is good. However, DPI/max sensor metrics are often more modest than Logitechโs top specs. | Logitech often pushes higher DPI figures (e.g. HERO 25K), more advanced wireless capabilities, and a broader range of sensors aimed at both casual and eSports users. |
| Build Quality | Zowie is praised for its clean build, minimal distractions, and solid hardware feel. Users report tight buttons, minimal flex, good materials, and durability. Reddit user reviews often highlight Zowieโs consistency in build quality. | Logitech also delivers strong build quality, particularly in higher-end models. Their casing, switches, internals often feel premium. Some trade-offs occur in wireless vs wired models, or lower-cost lines. |
| Software Support / Customization | Zowie is known for little to no softwareโmany of their mice avoid heavy customization tools, RGB, etc. This appeals to users who prefer plug-and-play, minimal setup, less latency. | Logitechโs strength is its software (e.g. G HUB), which allows deep customization: macro settings, lighting, DPI steps, on-board memory, wireless profiles, etc. This gives more flexibility but also increases complexity. |
| Simplicity vs Versatility | Zowieโs philosophy is often โwhat you see is what you needโโfocused on core performance and minimal distractions. Less โextraโ stuff. | Logitech tends to offer more โextrasโ which may include wireless, RGB, macro buttons, integrated software, etc., making their mice arguably more versatile for users who want customization. |
Bottom Line:
Whether Zowie is โbetterโ than Logitech depends on your priorities. For raw performance and minimalism, Zowie is excellent. For customization and feature breadth, Logitech often has the edge. If I were advising someone: if you play competitive FPS and want something simple that works well, go Zowie; if you want a more feature-rich tool that adapts to different uses, go Logitech.



| Feature | Logitech G403 | Zowie EC2-B |
|---|---|---|
| Shape & Size | Medium/Large ergonomic shape, slightly bulky hump. More forward-hump compared to EC2-B. Good for palm grip. | Medium size, ergonomic right-handed shape. Flatter profile in front; less โhumpโ compared to G403. |
| Weight | Approx. 87โg for G403 Hero (wired) version. | 90โg; fairly close to G403. |
| Sensor | Logitech G โHeroโ sensor (or PMW3366 in some versions) with very high max DPI (~25,600) and excellent tracking. Customizable via software (G HUB) | PixArt PMW-3360 sensor in EC2-B, reliable and trusted for eSports. Works in preset steps (400, 800, 1600, 3200 DPI) without heavy software. |
| Buttons & Features | RGB lighting, programmable buttons, software tweaks, heavier customization. | No RGB; minimal software, more plug-and-play. Fewer customization options. |
| Grip Suitability | Best for palm grip users or those who like a larger mouse body. With rubber side grips that help for wet or sweaty hands. | Great for palm grip or claw grip. Flat front helps claw grip. Smaller in front for better flicks for medium hands. |
Which to choose?
| Feature | EC2-A | EC2-B |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | Uses the older 3310 sensor. | Upgraded to 3360 sensor. Better tracking, less error. |
| Mouse Feet / Skates | Has two large mouse feet (large skates) which give more stability. | Has four smaller mouse feet (in corners) which reduce friction and can feel faster / more responsive. |
| Weight / Feel | Slightly heavier (~93 g) in EC2-A. Slightly more โlegacyโ balance, more stable for some. | Slightly lighter (~90 g) in EC2-B with some minor tweaks (scroll wheel, feet). |
| Design Differences | Slightly different scroll wheel style; sometimes translucent in older models. Some variance in coating. | More modern touches; matte finish; less gloss; different skates; updated cable in certain โBโ revisions. |
| Feature | EC1-B | EC2-B |
|---|---|---|
| Hand Size / Fit | Larger mouse; good for larger hands (longer palm, larger grip span). | Medium size; better suited for small to medium hands. More agile for flicks and quick movement. |
| Dimensions & Weight | Length ~128 mm, Width ~64 mm (bottom), ~69 mm (widest), Height ~43 mm; Weight ~94 g. | Length ~120 mm, Width ~61-64 mm, Height ~40 mm; Weight ~90 g. |
| Performance Breakdown | Larger size means more stability, good for sweeping mouse movements, less tiring for palm grip. Slightly more weight but higher stability. | Smaller size gives better agility, faster flicks, less strain for claw/fingertip grips; nearly same sensor performance so it really comes down to hand size and grip style. |
Yes. The Logitech G403 performs very well in FPS games. Some of its strong points:
So for many FPS gamers, especially those who like a decent-sized mouse, the G403 is a solid choice.
Here are some comparison points based on sensor performance, latency, etc.:
| Feature | Zowie EC-series | Logitech G403 |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor & Tracking | Zowie EC mice often use the PixArt PMW-3360 (and related). They are known for consistent tracking, low smoothing, and reliable performance. | G403โs HERO sensors are high end, with very good tracking, capable of very high speeds (IPS) without losing precision. |
| Latency / Response Time | Zowie keeps things simple: fewer software layers, no heavy RGB or bloatware, which often means fewer possible points of lag. Many competitive players prefer that minimalism. There are user reports and tests showing small but noticeable differences in click latency. | G403 also has very low latency and excellent response times, especially when tuned right. In test-comparisons, sometimes G403 edges ahead, thanks to its sensor and software optimizations. (E.g., in RTINGS comparison, G403 was said to feel โbetter builtโ and have slightly lower click latency than EC2 in some tests.) |
| Customization / Extras | Zowie typically has fewer built-in extras. Simpler drivers, less RGB, fewer buttons or macro options. This helps reduce unnecessary overhead. | G403 provides more customization: RGB lighting, programmable buttons, weight tuning, more CPI steps, etc. These extras can be useful if you want more control, but may not matter if your main goal is performance in FPS. |
If I were to recommend based on different kinds of players:
When it comes to choosing between Zowie vs Logitech, your best brand depends heavily on whether youโre a casual gamer or a pro gamer, as well as your grip style and the games you play most often.
Final Recommendation:
Consider your hand size, grip style, how intense your gaming sessions are, and whether youโll value custom software features or prefer reliable simplicity. Selecting based on those will ensure you get a mouse that not only performs well but fits you best.
WhatsApp us